Citizen Journal Home
Make a Donation
Our Store
Citizen Journal Home
Join our mailing list
Powered by MailMentum - Easy Email Marketing
Web's Best

« Criminals shooting 2 year-old kids don't kill 2 year-old kids. Gun rights supporters kill 2 year-old kids. | Main | As if we needed one more reason to avoid ever, ever watching "The View" »

April 27, 2006

File under: "Unsurprising"

Somehow it's not surprising that the US military is having difficulty recruiting Arab-Americans, as Reuters almost gleefully reports.

Reuters doesn't mention that Muslims are a tiny minority of the US population (3.5 million as of the 2000). But Reuters does blame US policy: "Many Arab-Americans also have felt singled out for heightened scrutiny by U.S. law enforcement and other authorities after the 2001 attacks, and may feel reluctant to work for a government they feel has discriminated against them. "A lot of policies seemed to focus on Arab-Americans after 9/11 so people asked: 'Why should I be part of an entity that is inflicting injustices or a selective approach on my own community?"' said Imad Hamad, head of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee's Dearborn office.

That is, Reuters buys into the mendacious lie that Muslim antipathy for the US is a product of the Bush administration. Let's face facts: Many Muslims in America may not feel any loyalty to the US - especially the engrained love of country required to join the military. A disproportionate share hope and pray for more 9/11-style attacks on the US; they cheered when the towers fell; they believe in "moral equivalency." Are we supposed to believe all of these dots are isolated, and inconsequential? Many Arab-Americans are Muslim first, Arabs second, and pretend to care about America when they need to.

Don't believe me? Ask around.

(H/T: Gadsden Flag, who adds: "Why were some Arab-Americans dancing in the streets with glee on Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn on 9/11? It couldn't be because they "felt singled out for heightened scrutiny by U.S. law enforcement and other authorities after the 2001 attacks.'")

UPDATE (4/28): The above post was posted at RedState and I was accused of posting something "racist," and banned from the site. Take a look at the comments and the Mods' reaction - evidently, even among "conservatives" we must abide speech regulations. I only wish the comments could've been posted here, where speech is virtually unregulated.

MORE: Pamela at Atlas Shrugs voices her support.

Posted by bill at April 27, 2006 04:26 PM

Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?



  Google
Web Citizen Journal