« I Support the President (Rant) | Main | Pay no attention. »
June 08, 2005
I Support America (response to Rant)
Blogging is an interesting form of writing, and I think that it can't help but affect the blogger's thought processes after awhile. In a wonderful illustration of this point, Good Samaritan pointed out the apparent inconstancy of my positions on social security reform in a very interesting post today. Whenever I am confronted with evidence that I have contradicted myself, I quote Walt Whitman: "Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes.)" But I don't feel that is the case here.
I began writing for this site as an intellectual exercise and a sort of politcal vision quest. The first piece I submitted here laid out my views, and I feel that I have navigated the narrow but substantive areas of agreement between the editor of this site and I in a manner that has been beneficial to me and to CJ readers.
But the "big tent" of the GOP seems to have rather tight security, and I have encountered a great deal of push-back for repeatedly suggesting that no one side has all the answers. Good Samaritan advances the questionable opinion that the Republic Party machine is smarter than America's citizens. What remarkable elitism! A small confederation of professionals thinking big thoughts has no valid claim of supremacy over other, (marginally) smaller confederations of professionals thinking big thoughts with a different ideological bent, and it certainly has no claim of supremacy over the mass of Americans who concern themselves with political matters and immerse themselves in data concerning the issues of interest to them.
Moveover, I wonder that any conservative can suggest that the Republican Party machine, which has abandoned fiscal discipline and cast aside the ethos of the insurgent wave that led to Republican capture of the House of Representatives in 1994, can claim intellectual superiority over Republican citizens. If I were a conservative, I would fervently hope that the Republican party machine was craven and disfunctional, because if it is not, then the debacle of big government conservatism could have been intended, and that is a chilling thought.
On Social Security reform my positions shift somewhat, depending on the time of day I write a post and the quality of the coffee I had that morning, but always I have maintained a single theme: get something useful done (soon), and move on. I am neither a Republican nor a Democrat, but I sincerely hope that both sides can work together, because I am an American, and America's problems are not improved by partisan wrangling.
Regarding the issue of risk, which I admit to harping on somewhat excessively, I am in no way convinced that the issue has been adequately addressed, and as proof I submit to you the fact that Social Security reform does not have strong public support. In politics, voters are the best indicators of how convincingly a politician has made his/her case; and with Social Security reform, the verdict is in: voters are not convinced.
On the issue of the unwillingness of Democrats to negotiate, I would argue that the Democratic Party is acting as it should. There are viewpoints that the GOP does not represent, and our republic is only made stronger by the open clash of ideas. If Republicans fear being humiliated by a Democratic Party unwilling to capitulate, I would suggest that they remember that each party is in the long-term only as strong as its support among voters. If the Democratic Party has found an issue on which it can humiliate the GOP, than the GOP is giving away voters.
The issue of Social Security reform is complex enough without politicians attacking each other's positions and bloggers fanning the flames. I am a young man, I grew up believing that Social Security would not be available to me, and so I am indifferent to any benefits I may ever receive from the program. But not everyone thinks this way, and out of respect for the concerns of those for whom Social Security is essential, I will continue to advocate for a solution, regardless of what side of the aisle that solution originated on.
Posted by Audi Partem Alteram at June 8, 2005 05:38 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.citizen-journal.net/cgi-bin/mt-316/mt-tb.cgi/133
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference I Support America (response to Rant):
» Payroll from Payroll
Payroll [Read More]
Tracked on November 29, 2006 01:33 AM
» Phentermine diet. from Pal pay phentermine.
Phentermine. Phentermine prescription. Picture of phentermine. [Read More]
Tracked on August 23, 2007 06:15 PM
» hawaii beaches from hawaii beaches
hawaii beaches [Read More]
Tracked on October 22, 2007 06:10 PM
» Soma cube. from Soma.
Temp soma. Soma intimates. Soma sonic music. Soma triathlon. Soma. Soma cannabis. [Read More]
Tracked on October 29, 2007 03:19 PM
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)






