|
|
![]() |
|
CJ's Bloggers | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A New Policy ApproachPosted by: Audi Partem Alteram
In a well-written piece appearing in the current issue of Foreign Affairs, Thomas Bleha lays out the case for a more comprehensive US policy approach to the development and use of broadband and cellular technology. According to Bleha, the United States, once among the leading nations in terms of broadband adoption, now ranks 13th. Cellular service in this country is shown to be inferior in both the quality and quantity of offerings when comparing to the service available in countries such as Japan. This article convincingly makes the case that US policy has failed to set the conditions necessary for the United States to benefit from the most important consumer technologies of the day. E-mail this entry to a friend. Replies: 2 Comments Posted by: Tom West On Saturday, April 23rd
Isn't this simply a case of economic specialization? NE Asia happens to have a densely concentrated population that makes things like wide-spread broadband adoption a natural development. Posted by: Nathan Smith On Friday, April 22nd
Maybe. But I'm suspicious of the language being used here. The idea that "Northeast Asia rac[ing] ahead" is some sort of a problem-- as if it's a good thing in itself to be first first first-- is misguided. Also, don't forget revealed preference. Just because we have less broadband doesn't mean we're worse off. It may show that the Japanese, Koreans and so on just like broadband more than we do. The private sector, after all, can also invest in these things. Where's the market failure? Why turn to the government? This is the mentality of a central planner. [Previous entry: "Morning Blend - Friday, April 22, 2005"] [Next entry: "Benedict XVI and MacIntyre"] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||