Make a Donation
Citizen Journal Home
Citizen Journal Home



CJ's Bloggers

 

A New Policy Approach

Posted by: Audi Partem Alteram
on April 22, 2005 @ 09:48 AM EST

In a well-written piece appearing in the current issue of Foreign Affairs, Thomas Bleha lays out the case for a more comprehensive US policy approach to the development and use of broadband and cellular technology. According to Bleha, the United States, once among the leading nations in terms of broadband adoption, now ranks 13th. Cellular service in this country is shown to be inferior in both the quality and quantity of offerings when comparing to the service available in countries such as Japan. This article convincingly makes the case that US policy has failed to set the conditions necessary for the United States to benefit from the most important consumer technologies of the day.

The opportunity costs of the poor policy choices Bleha enumerates are astronomical. Bleha summarizes the horrific missed opportunities as follows:

In 2001, Robert Crandall, an economist at the Brookings Institution, and Charles Jackson, a telecommunications consultant, estimated that "widespread" adoption of basic broadband in the United States could add $500 billion to the U.S. economy and produce 1.2 million new jobs. But Washington never promoted such a policy. Last year, another Brookings economist, Charles Ferguson, argued that perhaps as much as $1 trillion might be lost over the next decade due to present constraints on broadband development.

Even for the largest economy in the world, these are eye-opening figures. As Northeast Asian races ahead with advanced broadband and cellular technologies, "the United States is the only industrialized state without an explicit national policy for promoting broadband." This state of affairs cannot be allowed to go on.

Complacency has been the enemy of progress in this area since the beginning President Bush's first term. But complacency is deadly to the economic well being of our country and our citizens. Rational policies are needed that speed broadband adoption, increase competition among providers, and drive innovative new offerings in the areas of broadband and cellular technology. The world is racing ahead, and we must catch up.



E-mail this entry to a friend.

Replies: 2 Comments

Posted by: Tom West On Saturday, April 23rd

Isn't this simply a case of economic specialization? NE Asia happens to have a densely concentrated population that makes things like wide-spread broadband adoption a natural development.

Thus it seems to me perfectly natural that they spearhead development of these technologies.

I sincerely doubt that the Japanese are whining about their lack of wheat production and consequent growth and harvesting technologies.

Posted by: Nathan Smith On Friday, April 22nd

Maybe. But I'm suspicious of the language being used here. The idea that "Northeast Asia rac[ing] ahead" is some sort of a problem-- as if it's a good thing in itself to be first first first-- is misguided. Also, don't forget revealed preference. Just because we have less broadband doesn't mean we're worse off. It may show that the Japanese, Koreans and so on just like broadband more than we do. The private sector, after all, can also invest in these things. Where's the market failure? Why turn to the government? This is the mentality of a central planner.

That said, there may be a public-goods aspect to broadband use that is not readily apparent. That's the case you have to make.


[Previous entry: "Morning Blend - Friday, April 22, 2005"] [Next entry: "Benedict XVI and MacIntyre"]