|
|
![]() |
|
CJ's Bloggers | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Condi The Competent....Kerry The KreepPosted by: Lokisfur
An experienced, competent and brilliant public servant is now the "face of the United States" to the rest of the world. But to the Barbara Boxer's and John Kerry's and the rest of the Democrats who hate her guts -- black woman/Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice represents a traitor to her race and "one that got away" from their patronizing view of minorities in this Nation. The Democrats and the Left just cannot fathom the concept of a minority or woman who is not in need of a government handout or other help (meaning their help) in order to achieve "equality" to whites. E-mail this entry to a friend. Replies: 5 Comments Posted by: Publicus On Thursday, January 20th Chris, you're stumbling over your own feet. Your entire argument on Rice's behalf was made on the basis of her being black and female, not on the basis of competence. You're doing the very race-baiting you say you hate. If someone else had made the miscalculations Rice made, inside our outside government, you'd be yelling for their head. But you're giving Rice a break based on an obvious double standard. Why don't you tackle a subject more your speed? I hear Spongebob Squarepants is in the crosshairs now. Go for it, big guy. Posted by: lokisfur@aol.com">Chris On Thursday, January 20th
Sorry Charlie..I am not the bigot...I am against "affirmative Action" and for example the National Organization of Women who are effervescent in their praise of Boxer and Kerry, do not even acknowledge ms. Rice's incredible achievement for the "sisterhood". Posted by: Publicus On Thursday, January 20th
Like most of your arguments, Chris, that's easy to say and absent of evidence. The evidence in support of rejecting Rice for State is right there. Her record, regardless of gender or color, is one of incompetence. Kerry and Boxer declined to vote for her on that basis. If your support for her is based on gender and color (and you haven't given any other reasons) then Rice herself would decline your vote. She would certainly want to be evaluated by the strictest standards. You're giving her a break because you think it makes you a good guy. In other words, you're a liberal. Posted by: lokisfur@aol.com">Chris Ward On Thursday, January 20th
Publicus: Posted by: Publicus On Thursday, January 20th
It's funny at first watching Chris attempt to reason, but after a few minutes you feel like you're watching a clumsy child trying to roller skate. The gist of this little contribution is that Condi Rice deserves some sort of break because she's black, and that it's a feather in the cap of the GOP to hire a black woman even if she's demonstrated incompetence and a lack of integrity. Is she being judged "by the content of her character" when she did do poorly as NSA, and was part of the spectacular "miscalculation" (as VP Cheney called it) that had led is into a military quagmire in Iraq? No...but in an effort to bend over backwards and grant Ms. Rice the favor of his approval, Chris is saying just that. Leaders at any level need to be examined on the basis of performance, not color. Ms. Rice would certainly say so herself. Calling her critics "racist" for questioning her record is racism itself...if Ms. Rice is permitted "the soft bigotry of low expectations," to use a phrase Bush has quoted, then she's getting a free ride based on race...in other words, she's getting the benefits of the "affirmative action" thinking Chris has criticized in his other pithy contributions here. [Previous entry: "Dem's Plan Alternate Event"] [Next entry: "Top Ten Things that Democrats Will be Doing During the Inauguration"] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||